ScienceForecast review process is a scrutinizing process where a manuscript is scrutinized by at least three members who are expert in the similar field. Every article submitted to any SF journal is subjected for peer review earlier than it is published.

Scholarly peer review is a very essential process when processing the manuscript before publication. The quality of research work done by the authors will be evaluated by submitting to one or more people of similar competence of the same field of work. Scientific peer review is a quality-control system that analyzes whether all new scientific research, innovations, ideas are analyzed and critiqued by expert scientists before they become extensively accepted and appear online. Minimum three peer review process is mandatory in all journal in order to maintain the quality of the manuscript.

Many publications are following the single blind peer review process but ScienceForecast follows double blinded peer review process. The usual time between submission and final decision is 15 days and the minimum time between acceptance and final publication is one week.

Strengths of peer review process

Quality and worth of the manuscript will be judged by the expert scientist and will make stronger to improve the quality of work. Peer review validates the significance of claims and originality of the research peer review system covers some basic aspects of the manuscripts like the depth of the content and its relevance with the title, methods applied and the results elaborated. This technique polishes the raw manuscript.

Peer review process will not permit poor quality scientific research work to arrive at public in our site.